
books to me when i was still young were like teachers. me and my classmates in the elementary school used to believe in everything that the book says. to me, it is something that i should follow because it basically tells me what is right and never wrong.
i developed the said attitude till college. i read books so much that i have learned to love and have passion with the legal world. sure, its boring yet very interesting though . maybe because in my readings, i have discovered the different rights of every individual which must be respected by everybody. the same is protected and guaranteed irrespective of race, sex, status in the society and even age, hence, ideally, ANYBODY ENJOYS THE TREATMENT OF BEING EQUAL TO THAT OF EVERYBODY (really huh?, lets see!)
it is frustrating though that as i grow older, reality threatens me of the fact that all what i've read are nothing but fallacies!
just this time, i was able to know a person who have been captured in flagrante delicto. was detained for almost three weeks now. no information relative to his capture has yet been filed in court.
according to the book i've read, no person can ever be detained for a period longer than 24, 36 or 72 hours depending on the gravity of the offense committed, otherwise the dention shall be illegal.
the other book says, the philippine national police represents civilian and are considered, the law enforcers of the state. ENFORCERS! i suppose that means, they are the frontliners on the implementation of every law in the Philippines, right? simply said, these police officers have the responsibility to have "justice" be served to everybody, equally and without any qualifications.
the person i was referring to have been detained for almost a month now. with no information having filed against him in court. or even if there was, had actually posted bail for his provisional liberty.
but these policemen would not simply let him go! wanna know why?
because, they dont feel like letting him go without giving anything "for the boys"; they are serving "justice" fairly and squarely to all! (that is according to them, take note).
with this set up, i cant help but to wonder now whether the book have mistakenly taught me on the real definition of the term "justice" and "equality," or maybe the right words would be probably "INJUSTICE" and "INEQUALITY?"
realism sometimes thrust me within that what i learned from my teacher were but all myths. i casts doubts indeed.
yet, i leave it up to you.
as for me..
"the fighting may be hard and might have even be a long way to go but a journey begins always in a single step. i may be alone for now but still would be for the principle that i have learned and for what i believe. my teacher will always be my guide. and my teacher will be real, i know!"